“Have ye felt to sing the song of redeeming love? … I would ask, can ye feel so now?” — Alma 5:26
Before there were books, there was song.
In the ancient world of Israel, music was not entertainment — it was theology made audible. Alfred Edersheim, the 19th-century scholar of Jewish life in the time of Christ, observed that “the most important of these [Temple services], next to the sacrificial rites, was the hymnody of the sanctuary.”1 The Hebrew Bible itself carries musical notation woven into its very letters: the cantillation marks (ta’amim) that guided how every word was to be chanted.
The Talmud is emphatic on this point: “The Bible should be read in public and made understood to the hearers in a musical, sweet tune. And he who reads the Pentateuch without tune shows disregard for it and the vital value of its laws.”2 Reading without melody was not merely informal — it was considered an act of disrespect toward the sacred text. Joshua Jacobson summarizes the scholarly consensus: “Implicit in the concept of liturgical reading has always been the assumption that the text would be cantillated, not spoken.”3 When pilgrims ascended to Jerusalem for the great feasts, they sang the fifteen Shir HaMa’alot — the Songs of Ascent (Psalms 120–134) — accompanied by flutes along the dusty roads.4 Feast days were filled with music: responsive psalms sung by Levitical choirs, the blast of silver trumpets at the moment of sacrifice, the great Hallel echoing through the Temple courts.
The early church father Origen, writing in the third century, understood these songs as a graduated spiritual curriculum — each one corresponding to a stage of the soul’s ascent toward God. He wrote of “the fifteen Gradual Songs” and how, “by assessing the virtue of each song separately and collecting from them the grades of the soul’s advance,” one could trace the path by which the faithful soul “attains by way of all these to the nuptial chamber of the Bridegroom.”5 Philo of Alexandria, a Jewish philosopher contemporary with the apostles, went further still, teaching that “the heaven is always singing melodies, perfecting an all-musical harmony” — a cosmic song that Moses himself heard during his forty days on Sinai.6
When Alma asked whether his people had felt to sing the song of redeeming love — and whether they could feel so now — he may have been reaching into something ancient: a tradition where song was not merely emotional expression but spiritual transformation, where the act of singing was itself a means of ascent toward God.
With this musical heritage in mind, we turn to Alma 5 — not to make definitive claims, but to consider a possibility worth exploring: What if this sermon is not simply a collection of questions, but a structured liturgical sequence? What if Alma, as high priest over a people who observed the Law of Moses, was leading his congregation through a pattern they would have recognized — a Nephite Seder of repentance, sanctification, and covenant renewal?
The Seder and the Holy Order
The Passover Seder is an ordered pattern of fifteen steps that moves its participants from bondage to deliverance, from impurity to sanctification, from estrangement to acceptance before God. The Hebrew word seder means “order” — and Alma uses this very concept multiple times in his address, referring to what he calls the Seder Kadosh — the “Holy Order.” Specific references to this order appear in Alma 5:44, 49, 54, and the concept is developed further in Alma 13, where the “holy order of God” becomes a central theological framework.
While the Passover Haggadah as a written liturgical text was not codified until the Geonic period (the earliest complete text appearing in the Siddur of Rav Amram Gaon, c. 875 CE, with the first printed edition published in Guadalajara, Spain around 1482), the fifteen-step structure did not emerge ex nihilo. This framework echoes the Shir HaMa’alot (Songs of Ascent, Psalms 120–134)—fifteen psalms traditionally sung by the Levites on the fifteen semicircular steps of Solomon’s Temple (Mishnah Middot 2:5; Sukkah 51b). Leon J. Liebreich demonstrated that the fifteen Songs of Ascent correspond to the fifteen Hebrew words of the Priestly Blessing (Numbers 6:24–26), and that each psalm functioned “in the nature of a response following the Priestly Blessing” pronounced by priests standing on the Temple steps (Tosefta Sotah 7:7). This triple pattern—fifteen steps, fifteen psalms, fifteen words of blessing—formed an integrated liturgical architecture in First Temple worship.
The Nephites, as a community of Israelites who departed Jerusalem circa 600 BCE and faithfully observed the Law of Moses, would have carried these First Temple liturgical traditions with them. Alma, serving as high priest, appears to lead his people through a discourse structured around this ancient fifteen-step pattern of covenant renewal—a pattern that would later crystallize in the Passover Seder but had its origins in the temple liturgy his ancestors knew.
This observance is traditionally associated with the recitation of songs — which may illuminate Alma’s reference to the “song of redeeming love” (Alma 5:26). The musical patterns of ancient Israelite worship echo through the Songs of Moses (Exodus 15:1; Deuteronomy 32), the Hallel psalms sung at Passover, and the fifteen Songs of Ascent sung on the Temple steps.
This article presents an interpretive reading, not a claim of direct textual dependence. But the structural parallels are striking, and they invite us to read Alma 5 with fresh eyes — as a prophet leading his people through an ancient pattern of covenant renewal that points, at every step, toward the Savior.
For a detailed exploration of each Seder step — including the Songs of Ascent (Psalms 120–134), expanded Last Supper connections from Edersheim, Temple covenant parallels, and additional Alma 5 citations — see the Passover Seder guide in the Culture section. Each step page includes collapsible “Explore Further” sections with primary source content.
The Songs of Ascent and the Priestly Blessing
The connection between the fifteen Songs of Ascent and the Priestly Blessing deserves closer examination. In his landmark 1955 study published in the Journal of Biblical Literature, Liebreich demonstrated that twelve of these fifteen psalms contain direct verbal allusions to the four key words of the Priestly Blessing in Numbers 6:24–26: barak (bless), shamar (guard), chanan (be gracious), and shalom (peace).
Critically, the Tosefta Sotah VII.7 records that the priests pronounced the Aaronic Blessing on the steps of the hall that led to the interior of the Temple. Liebreich concluded that the phrase shir hama’alot — “a Song of Ascents” — literally means “a song rendered in conjunction with the Priestly Blessing which was pronounced on the ma’alot” (the steps). Each Song of Ascent was in the nature of a congregational response following the Priestly Blessing.
This tradition was preserved through the medieval period. Rashi (1040–1105), the most influential Jewish commentator, wrote explicitly on Psalm 120:1: “A song of ascents which the Levites will recite on the fifteen steps that go down from the Israelites’ court to the Women’s court, and there are fifteen psalms.”7 Radak (Rabbi David Kimchi, c. 1160–1235) offered a complementary interpretation, understanding these as pilgrim songs “said by pilgrims on the three Pilgrimage festivals on their ascent to Jerusalem.”8 Both traditions point to the same reality from different angles: pilgrims ascended to Jerusalem, and upon arrival at the Temple, they heard Levites singing on the steps. The physical journey and the liturgical destination were united in a single sacred experience.
This means the fifteen-step pattern was not merely a Seder convention or a literary device. It was embedded in the architecture and liturgy of the Temple itself — a physical, musical, and priestly ascent from the outer courts to the presence of God. When Alma speaks of the “holy order” and leads his people through a fifteen-step pattern of covenant renewal, he is drawing on a tradition that connects Passover, Temple worship, and the Priestly Blessing into a single ascending movement toward acceptance before the Lord.
Alfred Edersheim, in The Temple: Its Ministry and Services, describes how the Hallel (Psalms 113–118) was sung responsively during the Paschal offering — the Levites leading in song, the people repeating the first line of each psalm and responding to each subsequent line with “Hallelujah.” The priests drew a threefold blast from their silver trumpets when the Passover lamb was slain. Music, sacrifice, and priestly blessing were a unified act.
The Passover as Cosmic Pattern
Jewish tradition does not view Passover as a single historical event confined to the Exodus from Egypt. The rabbinic sources teach that Passover night — leil shimurim, the “night of vigil” (Exodus 12:42) — is a recurring cosmic moment of divine intervention.
The Midrash (Exodus Rabbah 18) teaches that on Passover night, God rescued Hezekiah from Sennacherib, delivered Daniel from the lion’s den, saved Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah from the furnace, and that on this same night, the Messiah and Elijah will be exalted. Passover is not simply remembered — it recurs.
Pirke de-Rabbi Eliezer (Ch. 21) pushes the pattern even further back, teaching that Adam himself instructed Cain and Abel to bring offerings on the eve of Passover. The first recorded offerings in human history are framed as paschal offerings, establishing Passover as a cosmic, pre-Sinaitic institution. For Latter-day Saints, this resonates powerfully with the teaching that Adam offered sacrifices "in similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten of the Father" (Moses 5:7) — the paschal connection making that similitude even more explicit.The Zohar, in its commentary on Parashat Bo (Exodus 10–13, covering the final plagues and institution of Passover), teaches that the retelling of the Exodus at the Seder is itself a mystical act: the one who relates the story “fervently and joyously, telling the tale with a high heart, shall be found worthy to rejoice in the Shekinah in the world to come, for rejoicing brings forth rejoicing; and the joy of Israel causes the Holy One Himself to be glad.” This transforms the Seder from a historical exercise into an encounter with the Divine Presence — and it illuminates why Alma’s retelling of the deliverance of his fathers is not mere history but sacred liturgical act.
If the Passover pattern is cosmic — woven into the fabric of creation, observed by Adam, encoded in the Temple architecture, and destined to culminate in the Messiah — then it is not surprising that a Nephite high priest, faithful to the Law of Moses, would draw on this same pattern to call his people to repentance and covenant renewal.
The Qumran Covenant Ceremony
In 1947, a Bedouin shepherd stumbled upon ancient scrolls hidden in caves near the Dead Sea — a discovery that would revolutionize our understanding of ancient Judaism. Among these Dead Sea Scrolls was a document scholars call the “Community Rule,” the handbook of a devout Jewish community that lived at Qumran roughly two centuries before Christ. These were Israelites deeply committed to the Law of Moses who had separated themselves from what they saw as corruption in Jerusalem. They preserved their traditions with meticulous care.
What makes these scrolls remarkable for our study is this: they describe an annual covenant renewal ceremony with striking similarities to Alma 5 — and they predate the written Haggadah by nearly a thousand years. This means the patterns Alma used were not medieval developments. They were ancient.
The Responsive Pattern: “Amen, Amen”
The Qumran ceremony unfolded in a specific order that will sound familiar. The priests would “bless the God of victories and all the works of his faithfulness,” and the congregation would respond together: “Amen, Amen.”9 Then came a striking liturgical structure: the priests would “recite the just deeds of God in his mighty works” and “proclaim all his merciful favours towards Israel” — while the Levites would “recite the iniquities of the children of Israel, all their blameworthy offences and their sins.”10
Picture it: one voice proclaiming God’s mercy, another voice naming the people’s sins — and the congregation responding to both. This “two-column” approach mirrors exactly what Alma does throughout his sermon, weaving together the story of deliverance with pointed questions about his people’s current spiritual state.
The Confession Formula
Perhaps most striking is the confession the people were required to make: “And all those who enter the covenant shall confess after them and they shall say: ‘We have acted sinfully, we have transgressed, we have sinned, we have committed evil, we and our fathers before us.’”11
Notice the phrase “we and our fathers before us.” This is precisely what Alma does in Alma 5:3–9 — he rehearses the bondage and deliverance of their fathers before turning to ask about their spiritual condition now. The pattern is identical: acknowledge ancestral history, then confront present reality.
The Warning Against Self-Deception
The Community Rule contains a warning that could have been lifted directly from Alma’s sermon: “Cursed by the idols which his heart reveres whoever enters this covenant, and places the obstacle of his iniquity in front of himself… When he hears the words of this covenant, he will congratulate himself in his heart, saying: ‘I will have peace, in spite of my walking in the stubbornness of my heart.’”12
The warning is pointed: someone hears the covenant words, congratulates himself, and thinks “I will have peace” — all while walking in stubbornness. Alma confronts the same danger: “Could ye say, if ye were called to die at this time, within yourselves, that ye have been sufficiently humble?” (Alma 5:27). Both texts expose self-deception — the comfortable assumption that outward participation equals inward faithfulness.
The Two Spirits
Perhaps most significantly, the Community Rule teaches a doctrine that illuminates Alma 5:38–41. The scroll declares: “He created man to rule the world and placed within him two spirits so that he would walk with them until the moment of his visitation: they are the spirits of truth and of deceit.”13 The text elaborates: “In the hand of the Prince of Lights is dominion over all the sons of justice; they walk on paths of light. And in the hand of the Angel of Darkness is total dominion over the sons of deceit; they walk on paths of darkness.”
This cosmic battle — light versus darkness, truth versus deceit, with every person choosing which voice to follow — is exactly how Alma frames the choice in Alma 5:38–41: “Behold, I say unto you, that the good shepherd doth call you; yea, and in his own name he doth call you, which is the name of Christ; and if ye will not hearken unto the voice of the good shepherd… behold, ye are not the sheep of the good shepherd… the devil is your shepherd.”
Two voices. Two paths. A choice that must be made.
This pattern reaches back to the very beginning. At the close of Deuteronomy, Moses is commanded to “write this song… and teach it the children of Israel” (Deuteronomy 31:19) — a priestly duty to transmit truth through sacred music. In his final address, Moses frames the covenant choice in terms that echo the two trees placed in Eden: “See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil… I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:15, 19). The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil become the archetype for every subsequent choice — the two spirits, the two paths, the two shepherds. From Eden to Sinai to Qumran to Zarahemla, the pattern holds: covenant bearers must choose whom they will serve (Joshua 24:15).
Why This Matters
The Qumran community and the Nephites never met. They lived on opposite sides of the world. Yet both groups — Israelites faithful to the Law of Moses — preserved remarkably similar covenant patterns: responsive liturgy with congregational “Amen,” confession that acknowledged ancestral history, warnings against self-deception, and the imagery of two competing spiritual forces calling for allegiance.
This is not coincidence. It is evidence that Alma was drawing on authentic ancient tradition — patterns that existed in Israelite worship long before the medieval Haggadah codified them. The Nephites carried these traditions across the ocean. The Qumran community preserved them in desert caves. And both testify that covenant renewal followed a recognizable structure: remember, confess, choose, and respond.
Part I: Preparation for the Coming of the Messiah
Explore these steps in detail: Kadesh | Urchatz | Karpas | Yachatz | Maggid
Step 1: Kadesh — קֹדֶשׁ — “Sanctify”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 120 | Theme: Sanctification and readiness to enter into a covenant with God
The word kadesh means “holy,” “sanctified,” or “consecrated.” Alma uses this word at the very beginning of his introduction: “I, Alma, having been consecrated by my father, Alma, to be a high priest over the church of God, he having power and authority from God to do these things” (Alma 5:3). The Seder begins with consecration — setting the evening apart as sacred — and so does Alma’s sermon, establishing his priestly authority before proceeding.
But why would a Nephite high priest frame his sermon around the Exodus pattern at all? Because this was not Alma’s innovation — it was established tradition. Nephi himself set the precedent when he explicitly compared his family’s deliverance from Jerusalem to Israel’s exodus from Egypt. Speaking to his rebellious brothers, Nephi declared: “Let us be strong like unto Moses; for he truly spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided hither and thither, and our fathers came through” (1 Nephi 4:2). Later, in his great discourse to Laman and Lemuel, Nephi drew extended parallels between their journey and the Exodus — from bondage in a wicked land, through wilderness wandering, toward a promised inheritance (1 Nephi 17:23–42). When Alma asks the people of Zarahemla to remember “the captivity of your fathers,” he is drawing on a Nephite tradition that Nephi himself drew from the Mosaic tradition: their story is the Exodus story, renewed in a new land.
“Have ye sufficiently retained in remembrance the captivity of your fathers?” — Alma 5:6
Step 2: Urchatz — וּרְחַץ — “Wash”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 121 | Theme: Initial purification — baptism
The Seder includes two washings, each with distinct meaning. Urchatz, the first washing, corresponds to baptism — the initial cleansing that makes one a member of the covenant community. (The second washing, Rachtzah in Step 6, corresponds to the washing and anointing of priests before officiating in the tabernacle or temple.)
Alma concludes his opening verse with exactly this point: “yea, and he did baptize his brethren in the waters of Mormon” (Alma 5:3). The Nephite covenant community was founded on this first washing. Before anything else in this sermon — before the questions, before the warnings, before the invitation — Alma reminds them: you are a baptized people. Just as the Israelites passed through the Red Sea, your fathers passed through the waters of Mormon. That is who you are — part of a covenant community.
“Yea, and he did baptize his brethren in the waters of Mormon.” — Alma 5:3
Step 3: Karpas — כַּרְפַּס — “Greens Dipped in Salt Water”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 122 | Theme: Bondage and tears born of family division
At the Seder, herbs are dipped in salt water — new life plunged into bitter, salty tears. But Jewish sources teach that there is a deeper meaning to the term karpas, which also means “fine linen.” They connect this tradition to Joseph and his coat of many colors (The Hidden Meaning of Karpas). Joseph’s brothers, consumed with jealousy, stripped him of that coat, dipped it in blood, and sold him into bondage (Genesis 37:23–28). Dipping the karpas recalls this moment: brothers betraying a brother, leading to captivity and tears.
Alma’s audience lived this pattern — twice. In Alma 5:4, he reminds them: “they were delivered out of the hands of the people of king Noah.” A wicked Nephite king oppressing his own people. Then in verse 5: “they were brought into bondage by the hands of the Lamanites” — their own brothers, descendants of Laman and Lemuel, whose jealousy toward Nephi echoed the sons of Israel toward Joseph. The same story, repeated: brotherly contention leads to bondage. Bondage leads to tears.
“They were delivered out of the hands of the people of king Noah, by the mercy and power of God.” — Alma 5:4
Step 4: Yachatz — יַחַץ — “Break”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 123 | Theme: Breaking that leads to transformation
Yachatz — the middle matzah is broken in two. The larger piece is hidden as the afikomen — “that which comes after” — to be revealed later. Breaking precedes redemption.
Alma uses the language of breaking explicitly: “Were the bands of death broken, and the chains of hell which encircled them about, were they loosed? I say unto you, Yea, they were loosed” (Alma 5:9). The chains that held them in bondage were broken. But breaking must also happen within: “According to his faith there was a mighty change wrought in his heart” (Alma 5:12). The Savior would later teach that the acceptable sacrifice is “a broken heart and a contrite spirit” (3 Nephi 9:20).
The pattern: bands broken outwardly, heart broken inwardly, mighty change as the result.
“Were the bands of death broken, and the chains of hell which encircled them about, were they loosed? I say unto you, Yea, they were loosed.” — Alma 5:9
Step 5: Maggid — נָגַד — “Tell”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 124 | Theme: Telling the story of deliverance
Maggid is the heart of the Seder — the retelling of the deliverance story. It begins with questions (not limited to four; you can ask as many as needed) and proceeds to tell the Exodus narrative.
Alma does both. He asks nearly fifty questions throughout his sermon. And he tells the story: “Behold, I can tell you — did not my father Alma believe in the words which were delivered by the mouth of Abinadi?” (Alma 5:11). This is the Nephite Exodus in miniature: Abinadi stood before a wicked king like Moses before Pharaoh. Alma the Elder heard and believed. He led his people through the waters of Mormon. They were delivered from bondage. The pattern is the same.
Later, Alma names the liturgical framework explicitly: “I am called to speak after this manner, according to the holy order of God” (Alma 5:44). The Hebrew seder kadosh — “holy order” — is not merely a claim of priesthood authority. It is a declaration that this discourse follows a sacred pattern. This is how the story is told. This is how covenant renewal is done.
“Behold, I can tell you — did not my father Alma believe in the words which were delivered by the mouth of Abinadi?” — Alma 5:11
Part II: The Life and Ministry of Jesus Christ
Explore these steps in detail: Rachtzah | Motzi | Matzah | Maror | Korech | Shulchan Orech
Step 6: Rachtzah — רָחַץ — “Wash Again”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 125 | Theme: Priestly purification — washing and anointing
The Seder’s second washing, Rachtzah, corresponds to a deeper level of purification than the first. While Urchatz (Step 2) parallels baptism — the initial washing that brings one into the covenant — Rachtzah parallels the washing and anointing of the sons of Aaron before they could officiate in the tabernacle (Exodus 29:4–7). This is preparation for sacred service, for approaching the altar, for entering the presence of God.
Alma shifts to this theme: “there can no man be saved except his garments are washed white; yea, his garments must be purified until they are cleansed from all stain, through the blood of him of whom it has been spoken by our fathers” (Alma 5:21–22). This is not merely baptism — it is the deeper cleansing that prepares one to stand before God with “pure hearts and clean hands” (Alma 5:19).
“Can ye look up to God at that day with a pure heart and clean hands?” — Alma 5:19
Step 7: Motzi — מוֹצִיא — “Bring Forth”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 126 | Theme: God’s provision and sustenance
Motzi is the blessing over bread — acknowledging God as the one who “brings forth bread from the earth.” This step recognizes divine provision and calls for a response of gratitude.
Alma uses this exact language: “Yea, come unto me and bring forth works of righteousness” (Alma 5:35). The invitation is to bring forth fruit in response to what God has brought forth. And there is a warning: “whosoever bringeth forth not good fruit, or whosoever doeth not the works of righteousness, the same have cause to wail and mourn” (Alma 5:36). Divine provision demands a response.
“Yea, come unto me and bring forth works of righteousness.” — Alma 5:35
Step 8: Matzah — מַצָּה — “Unleavened Bread”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 127 | Theme: Sincerity, humility, and haste
While Motzi is the general blessing over bread, matzah focuses specifically on unleavened bread — bread without the puffing of leaven, symbolizing humility and sincerity before God. The word matzah shares a root with matsa — “to find” — raising the question: when examined, what will be found?
Alma uses both themes. He warns against those who are “puffed up in the vain things of the world” (Alma 5:37) — the language of leavened bread, rising with pride. And he warns that “such an one is not found guiltless” (Alma 5:29). The question of matzah is twofold: Are you humble (unleavened)? And when examined, will you be found worthy?
“Such an one is not found guiltless.” — Alma 5:29
Step 9: Maror — מָרוֹר — “Bitter Herbs”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 128 | Theme: The bitterness of suffering and the purpose of adversity
Maror — the bitter herbs — recalls the bitterness of bondage in Egypt. Alma confronts his people with the bitter consequences of sin: “whosoever bringeth forth evil works, the same becometh a child of the devil… and for his wages he receiveth death” (Alma 5:41–42). The wages of sin are bitter indeed.
But the bitter herbs also serve a redemptive purpose. This connects to the suffering servant archetype we encountered in Karpas. Joseph — stripped of his coat, sold into bondage, imprisoned — tasted the bitter herbs of betrayal and affliction. Yet through that bitterness, he became the instrument of his family’s salvation. The pattern repeats: those who endure bitterness with faith become vessels of redemption. Joseph Smith knew this pattern intimately, told from Liberty Jail that “all these things shall give thee experience, and shall be for thy good” (D&C 122:7).
Christ Himself drank the bitter cup: “which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore” (D&C 19:18). His willingness to endure the bitter gives Him the unique capacity to succor those who taste bitterness in mortality.
“Whosoever bringeth forth evil works, the same becometh a child of the devil… and for his wages he receiveth death.” — Alma 5:41–42
Step 10: Korech — כֹּרֶךְ — “The Sandwich”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 129 | Theme: Binding together the bitter and the sweet
In the Seder, korech combines the matzah and bitter herbs together in a single bite — a tradition attributed to Hillel. The bitter and the unleavened are bound together, teaching that suffering and humility are inseparable companions on the path to redemption.
In the Seder, maror (bitter herbs) is dipped in charoset — a sweet mixture of apples, nuts, and wine representing the mortar the slaves used to build Pharaoh’s cities. The charoset momentarily sweetens the bitter taste before being shaken off. Then in korech, the bitter herbs are bound with matzah in Hillel’s sandwich (some traditions include charoset as well). The interplay of bitter and sweet teaches that redemption does not erase the memory of suffering but transforms it. The mortar that once symbolized oppression becomes, when touched with sweetness and wrapped in the bread of humility, a reminder that God redeems through our labors, not merely from them.
Alma binds these same elements together in a single invitation: “He sendeth an invitation unto all men, for the arms of mercy are extended towards them, and he saith: Repent, and I will receive you. Yea, he saith: Come unto me and ye shall partake of the fruit of the tree of life; yea, ye shall eat and drink of the bread and the waters of life freely” (Alma 5:33–34). Mercy extended (the sweetness), repentance required (the bitter acknowledgment of sin), bread offered (the matzah that binds them) — the korech in a single passage. The bitter and the sweet cannot be separated on the path to redemption.
“The arms of mercy are extended towards them, and he saith: Repent, and I will receive you.” — Alma 5:33
Step 11: Shulchan Orech — שֻׁלְחָן עוֹרֵךְ — “The Set Table”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 130 | Theme: Partaking of the communal and festive meal
Shulchan Orech is the step where participants partake of the festive meal — symbolizing community, unity, and the blessings of God’s provision. In Christian tradition, this parallels the sacrament, where believers partake in remembrance of Christ’s atoning sacrifice.
Alma extends a direct invitation to partake: “Come unto me and ye shall partake of the fruit of the tree of life; yea, ye shall eat and drink of the bread and the waters of life freely” (Alma 5:34). The table is set. The fruit of the tree, the bread of life, the living water — all offered freely. This is the Nephite feast of redemption, prepared for all who will come.
“Come unto me and ye shall partake of the fruit of the tree of life; yea, ye shall eat and drink of the bread and the waters of life freely.” — Alma 5:34
Part III: The Resurrection, Gathering of Israel, Second Coming, and Millennium
Explore these steps in detail: Tzafun | Barech | Hallel | Nirtzah
Step 12: Tzafun — צָפוּן — “Hidden”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 131 | Theme: The hidden things revealed — the Afikomen found
Tzafun is the moment when the hidden afikomen — the broken piece of matzah concealed during Yachatz — is found, brought forth, and eaten. What was broken and hidden is now revealed and shared. This step carries powerful resurrection symbolism: the body that was broken and buried is brought forth in glory.
Alma asks his people to envision this very moment: “Do you look forward with an eye of faith, and view this mortal body raised in immortality, and this corruption raised in incorruption, to stand before God to be judged?” (Alma 5:15). The broken, buried body — like the broken, hidden matzah — will be brought forth in glory. And when that day comes, nothing will remain concealed: “Can ye imagine yourselves brought before the tribunal of God… having a remembrance of all your guilt, yea, a perfect remembrance of all your wickedness?” (Alma 5:18). What was hidden will be revealed. The question is whether we will be found like the afikomen — broken, yes, but redeemed.
“Do you look forward with an eye of faith, and view this mortal body raised in immortality, and this corruption raised in incorruption, to stand before God to be judged?” — Alma 5:15
Step 13: Barech — בָּרֵךְ — “Bless”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 132 | Theme: Blessings, priesthood, and the Third Cup of Redemption
Barech — the blessing after the meal — is one of the most distinctive practices in Jewish tradition. While modern Christians typically bless food before eating, the Torah commands the opposite: “When thou hast eaten and art full, then thou shalt bless the LORD thy God” (Deuteronomy 8:10). This practice, called Birkat Hamazon (Grace After Meals), remains central to Jewish liturgy today.
The Nephites knew this practice. When Alma visited Amulek’s home, the text preserves the exact Deuteronomic pattern: “Alma ate bread and was filled; and he blessed Amulek and his house, and he gave thanks unto God” (Alma 8:22). First eating, then being filled, then blessing and thanking — the sequence matches Deuteronomy precisely. Joseph Smith in 1829 would have had no way of knowing this distinctive Jewish custom, yet it appears in the Book of Mormon exactly as an observant Israelite would practice it.14
Barech also includes the pouring of the Third Cup — the Cup of Redemption. This is the cup Jesus likely identified at the Last Supper when He said: “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you” (Luke 22:20). Alma invokes this redemption theme directly: “their souls did expand, and they did sing redeeming love” (Alma 5:9). The blessing after the meal, the cup of redemption, the song of redeeming love — all converge in this step.
“Their souls did expand, and they did sing redeeming love. And I say unto you that they are saved.” — Alma 5:9
Step 14: Hallel — הַלֵּל — “Praise”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 133 | Theme: Praise, thanksgiving, and the Fourth Cup
Hallel is the singing of psalms of praise — the great crescendo of the Seder. The Hallel psalms (Psalms 113–118) were sung responsively: the Levites would chant each line, and the congregation would respond “Hallelujah!” This was the most participatory musical moment in the Temple calendar. The Fourth Cup, the Cup of Praise, accompanies this singing with the declaration: “I will take you as my people” (Exodus 6:7).
This is almost certainly what Jesus and His apostles sang on the night He was betrayed. Matthew records: “And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount of Olives” (Matthew 26:30). The “hymn” was the Hallel — the same psalms of praise that had been sung at Passover for centuries. On that night, Jesus sang Psalm 118 with His disciples: “The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner” (Psalm 118:22). Hours later, He would become that rejected stone.
Alma twice invokes this singing tradition. First, describing the deliverance of his fathers: “their souls did expand, and they did sing redeeming love” (Alma 5:9). Then, turning the question to his audience: “If ye have felt to sing the song of redeeming love, I would ask, can ye feel so now?” (Alma 5:26). The Hallel is not a performance — it is a lived experience of gratitude that must be renewed. You cannot sing another person’s song. You cannot coast on your fathers’ praise. The question is always now: can ye feel so now?
“If ye have felt to sing the song of redeeming love, I would ask, can ye feel so now?” — Alma 5:26
Step 15: Nirtzah — נִרְצָה — “Accepted”
Psalm of Ascent: Psalm 134 | Theme: Being accepted of God — the culmination
Nirtzah means “accepted” — the Seder is complete, and the participants are accepted before God. This is the summit of the ascending pattern. Liebreich demonstrated that the fifteenth and final Song of Ascent (Psalm 134) concludes with the Priestly Blessing itself: “The Lord that made heaven and earth bless thee out of Zion” — the very benediction that was pronounced on the Temple steps where these songs were sung.
Alma invites his people to imagine this moment of acceptance: “Can you imagine to yourselves that ye hear the voice of the Lord, saying unto you, in that day: Come unto me ye blessed, for behold, your works have been the works of righteousness upon the face of the earth?” (Alma 5:16). This is Nirtzah — hearing the Lord pronounce you accepted, welcomed, blessed.
And what does acceptance look like? Alma makes it concrete: “The names of the righteous shall be written in the book of life, and unto them will I grant an inheritance at my right hand” (Alma 5:58). Your name inscribed. Your place secured. An inheritance at His right hand. The entire fifteen-step pattern has been leading to this moment — from sanctification through suffering, from retelling through purification, from the broken bread to the praise song — all converging on the question: will your name be written?
“Come unto me ye blessed, for behold, your works have been the works of righteousness upon the face of the earth.” — Alma 5:16
The Seder concludes with the declaration: “Next year in Jerusalem!” — the hope of return, of gathering, of the Messiah’s coming. Alma, speaking to Nephites in a distant land, carries the same hope forward: the holy order endures, the pattern holds, and the God who delivered their fathers will deliver them — if they will walk the ascending path.
Alma’s Fifty Questions
One of the most striking features of Alma 5 is its relentless questioning. The Maggid section of the Seder traditionally centers on questions — the famous Four Questions asked by the youngest participant — but the tradition is not limited to four. One could ask ten or twenty. Alma asks nearly fifty.
This question-driven approach mirrors the Seder’s pedagogical method. The Zohar teaches that the retelling of the Exodus must be done “fervently and joyously” — and Alma’s relentless questioning is itself a form of sacred retelling, pressing his audience to internalize the pattern of deliverance not as distant history but as present spiritual reality.
This responsive structure has ancient roots. A.Z. Idelsohn documents three forms of public singing in ancient Israelite worship, all “based upon the principle of response.”15 In Form A, the leader would intone a phrase and the congregation would repeat it as a refrain; in Form B, the congregation echoed what the leader had just sung; in Form C, leader and congregation alternated in true responsive dialogue. Ancient worship also employed short response-refrains: “Amen, Halleluyah, Hoshianah (Oh, help!), Anenu (Answer us!).”16 The Hebrew Anenu — “Answer us!” — directly parallels the structure of Alma’s questioning. His audience was not passive. They were being called to respond.
The cantillation marks (te’amim) embedded in the Hebrew Bible were specifically designed to “separate question from answer.”17 If Alma’s discourse followed ancient patterns, his rhetorical questions would have carried distinct musical marking — rising inflections that signaled to the congregation: this requires your response.
Among Alma’s questions:
- “Have ye sufficiently retained in remembrance the captivity of your fathers?” (5:6)
- “Have ye received his image in your countenances?” (5:14)
- “Can you imagine to yourselves that ye hear the voice of the Lord?” (5:16)
- “Can ye look up to God at that day with a pure heart and clean hands?” (5:19)
- “Could ye say, if ye were called to die at this time… that ye have been sufficiently humble?” (5:27)
- “Is there one among you who is not stripped of envy?” (5:29)
- “Is there one among you that doth make a mock of his brother?” (5:30)
- “If ye have experienced a change of heart, and if ye have felt to sing the song of redeeming love, I would ask, can ye feel so now?” (5:26)
Each question is a step in the ascending pattern — pressing deeper, demanding more honest self-examination, moving the listener from comfortable remembrance toward uncomfortable accountability. The questions are not rhetorical. They are liturgical. They are the Maggid of the Nephite Seder.
Sources and Further Reading
Primary Scripture:
- Alma 5 (complete text of the Nephite Seder)
- Alma 7 (Alma’s blessing at Gideon — the Barech)
- Alma 13 (the “holy order” of the priesthood)
- Alma 36–42 (Alma’s counsel to his three sons — the Four Sons parallel)
- Psalms 120–134 (Songs of Ascent)
- Numbers 6:24–26 (Priestly Blessing)
- Exodus 6:6–7; 12–13 (Passover institution and the Four Cups)
- Moses 5:7 (Adam’s sacrifices in similitude of the Only Begotten)
Hebrew Lexicon:
- Blue Letter Bible lexicon entries (linked inline throughout)
Jewish Primary Sources:
- Exodus Rabbah 15, 17:3, 18 (Midrash Rabbah — Pesach traditions)
- Zohar, Bo (Passover mystical theology — retelling obligation, two bloods)
- Pirke de-Rabbi Eliezer, Chs. 21, 28 (Adam’s Passover, Abrahamic covenant on Passover night)
- Talmud Bavli, Pesachim 64a, 118a (Hallel during Paschal offering, the Great Hallel)
- Tosefta Sotah VII.7 (Priestly Blessing pronounced on the Temple steps)
- Mishnah Middot 2:5; Sukkah 51b (Fifteen Temple steps and the Songs of Ascent)
- Community Rule (1QS) I–IV (Dead Sea Scrolls — covenant renewal ceremony)
- Nehemiah 8:1–12 (Ezra’s public Torah reading)
Classical Sources:
- Philo of Alexandria. On Dreams, trans. C. D. Yonge (1854). See especially §VI ¶1.35-36 on celestial music.
- Origen of Alexandria. Commentary on the Song of Songs, trans. R. P. Lawson (1957). See Prologue §4 on songs as graduated spiritual ascent.
Scholarship:
- Liebreich, Leon J. “The Songs of Ascents and the Priestly Blessing.” Journal of Biblical Literature 74, no. 1 (1955): 33–36.
- Edersheim, Alfred. The Temple: Its Ministry and Services (1874), Ch. 3: Temple Order, Revenues, and Music; Ch. 11: The Passover; Ch. 12: The Paschal Feast and the Lord’s Supper.
- Edersheim, Alfred. The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, Book 5, Ch. 10: The Paschal Supper — The Institution of the Lord’s Supper.
- Idelsohn, A.Z. Jewish Music in Its Historical Development (New York: Schocken Books, 1967). See especially pp. 20–21 on responsive forms and pp. 35–36 on cantillation requirements.
- Jacobson, Joshua R. Chanting the Hebrew Bible, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2019). See pp. 3, 9 on cantillation as liturgical reading.
- Werner, Eric. The Sacred Bridge: The Interdependence of Liturgy and Music in Synagogue and Church During the First Millennium (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959).
- García Martínez, Florentino, and Eibert J.C. Tigchelaar. The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997–1998). See Community Rule (1QS) I–IV on covenant renewal.
- Leow, Wen-Pin. Like Mount Zion: Conceptual Metaphor and Critical Spatiality in the Songs of Ascents (Tübingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2024). Recent scholarly analysis of Psalms 120–134, confirming the Temple step tradition and Liebreich’s Priestly Blessing connection.
- Gruber, Mayer I. Rashi’s Commentary on Psalms (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2004). English translation of Rashi’s 11th-century commentary, including his interpretation of the Songs of Ascent as Levitical songs sung on the Temple steps.
- Baker, Joshua, and Ernest W. Nicholson, eds. The Commentary of Rabbi David Kimhi on Psalms CXX–CL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973). English translation of Radak’s 12th-century commentary, presenting the pilgrimage interpretation of the Songs of Ascent.
Related:
- The Passover Seder — A Messianic Seder Guide (CFM Corner Culture Section — includes expanded Last Supper, Temple covenant, and Alma 5 dropdowns for each step)
Footnotes
Alfred Edersheim, The Temple: Its Ministry and Services (1874), Chapter 3: “Temple Order, Revenues, and Music.” Edersheim continues: “We can conceive what it must have been in the days of David and of Solomon. But even in New Testament times it was such that St. John could find no more adequate imagery to portray heavenly realities and the final triumph of the Church than that taken from the service of praise in the Temple.” ↩︎
A.Z. Idelsohn, Jewish Music in Its Historical Development (New York: Schocken Books, 1967), 35. ↩︎
Joshua R. Jacobson, Chanting the Hebrew Bible, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2019), 3. ↩︎
Edersheim, The Temple, Chapter 3: “The flute was also used by the festive pilgrim-bands on their journey to Jerusalem, to accompany ’the Psalms of Degrees,’ or rather of ‘Ascent’ (Isaiah 30:29), sung on such occasions.” ↩︎
Origen of Alexandria, Commentary on the Song of Songs, Prologue §4 (c. 240 AD), trans. R. P. Lawson. Origen enumerates seven songs of Scripture as a graduated progression, culminating in the Song of Songs, and notes that the fifteen Gradual Songs (Psalms 120–134) offer an alternative framework for tracing “the grades of the soul’s advance.” ↩︎
Philo of Alexandria, On Dreams §VI ¶1.35-36, trans. C. D. Yonge. Philo writes that heaven produces “all-musical harmony, in accordance with the motions of all the bodies which exist therein,” and suggests that Moses heard these celestial melodies during his forty days on Sinai, becoming an “incorporeal hearer” of divine song. ↩︎
Rashi on Psalms 120:1. English translation in Mayer I. Gruber, Rashi’s Commentary on Psalms (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2004). Also available at Sefaria: https://www.sefaria.org/Rashi_on_Psalms.120.1 ↩︎
Rabbi David Kimhi (Radak), Commentary on Psalm 120:1, in Joshua Baker and Ernest W. Nicholson, eds., The Commentary of Rabbi David Kimhi on Psalms CXX–CL (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), 3. ↩︎
Community Rule (1QS) I:18–II:1, in Florentino García Martínez and Eibert J.C. Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition (Leiden: Brill, 1997), 1:70–72. ↩︎
1QS I:21–24, in García Martínez and Tigchelaar, DSSSE, 1:72. ↩︎
1QS I:24–26, in García Martínez and Tigchelaar, DSSSE, 1:72. ↩︎
1QS II:11–14, in García Martínez and Tigchelaar, DSSSE, 1:74. ↩︎
1QS III:17–21, in García Martínez and Tigchelaar, DSSSE, 1:76–78. ↩︎
Angela M. Crowell and John A. Tvedtnes, “The Nephite and Jewish Practice of Blessing God after Eating One’s Fill,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 6, no. 2 (1997): 251–54. The authors note that this practice appears “only in passing, as one would expect for an authentic record” — the kind of incidental detail that marks genuine cultural memory rather than conscious fabrication. ↩︎
Idelsohn, Jewish Music, 20. ↩︎
Idelsohn, Jewish Music, 21. ↩︎
Jacobson, Chanting the Hebrew Bible, 9. ↩︎